Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2009

Review of Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell

Outliers Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell


My rating: 5 of 5 stars
This book confirmed a lot of what I have thought about the necessary confluence of opportunity, ability and dedication that seems to be the necessary and sufficient condition for success; however, I think Gladwell's strongest point has to do with education and the possibility of modifying social institutions in order to provide opportunities to succeed to the millions of people around the world who, no matter how talented and dedicated they may be, are shut out because of their location, their birth date or some other factor that could be compensated for. As a global culture, we do not need to continue allowing such factors to become disabilities. Relatively simple steps, such as providing year-round schooling for children so that children from uneducated families do not fall increasingly behind their middle- and upper-class peers (who benefit from formal and informal instruction during the long US summer break while the lower-class students are left to entertain themselves), could give millions of young people the opportunity to succeed. Likewise, grouping students by the quarter in which they were born rather than by the year would reduce the unfair inequity of having children nearly a year younger than some of their classmates compete against the older children.

I was more impressed by Outliers than I was by Tipping Point, though I thought it was a great book, too. Outliers was, as Gladwell said, a very personal book for him. Had he not benefited from a series of happy coincidences that led him to excel professionally, he would have been yet another bright, under-employed adult. Anyone with an interest in social justice and education should definitely read this book. Even more so, anyone who is working to improve society should read it for its inspiring ideas.

View all my reviews >>

Thursday, March 12, 2009

GET GRAPHIC: The World In Words and Pictures

GET GRAPHIC: The World In Words and Pictures

Get Graphic is a library-based site about graphic novels -- full of information on using them in school and public libraries.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Fwd: New Child Safety Act - Update (long)

Here is some sane, factual information about the Child Safety issue. I don't think it is going to ban children from libraries, since it affects only books published after Feb 10 of this year. Also, the ALA and various publishing and printing groups are trying to get the Feds to see the problem before it explodes on them.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Terry Nathan at IBPA
Date: Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Subject: New Child Safety Act - Update (long)

Dear Peyton,

Information about the Consumer Product Safety Inspection Act continues to roll in, and the outcome is anything but clear. One thing that does seem clear is that this Act applies only to books manufactured after February 10, 2009.

I encourage you to 1) contact your printer for input on this issue, and 2) contact your representatives in Washington, DC to voice your concerns. I am including a list of representatives below.

We have been reaching out to our colleagues in various key segments of the industry for information and are continuing to monitor this issue on a daily basis. We will keep you updated.

Below are some of the more useful bits of information we have been gathering. Note that the message from Joe Upton of Malloy is lengthy, but we felt the information contained therein from a printer's perspective was important to include.

Kind regards,

Terry Nathan
Executive Director
Independent Book Publishers Association (formerly PMA)

--

From Bookselling This Week: http://news.bookweb.org/6534.html

From PW Children's Bookshelf: http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6629950.html?nid=2788

SPAN Website: http://www.spannet.org/cpsia-info-2009.htm

In addition to your own representatives, here is a list of others to contact:
1. Sen. Chuck Schumer, NY - -represents most publishers. 202-224-6542.......local 212-486-4430 (folks aren't having much luck with this one; best to try the DC one)
2. Sen. Diane Feinstein, who has been influential on the issue 202-224-3841
3. Sen. John Rockefeller, who will soon oversee the committee of jurisdiction, 202-224-6472
4. Sen. Daniel Inouye, who will also oversee committee of jurisdiction 202-224-3934
5. Cong. Henry Waxman, the new chair of the House Committee of jurisdiction 202-225-3976
6. Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office, 202-225-0100

--

With permission from Joe Upton of Malloy, Inc., dated 1/12/09

I can share what we have learned at Malloy about the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA). For those of you who don't know Malloy, we are a book printer in Ann Arbor, MI.

Unfortunately, the CPSIA is a concern to the entire book industry. Printers need to verify that the books they produce are compliant with the new law; publishers and booksellers, along with printers, face significant legal consequences and supply interruptions if products do not comply with the law. In addition, if the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) insists that every print-run (e.g., 1000 copies of a simple 64 page, saddle-stitched, one-color children's workbook) has to be tested and have a Certification of Conformity (COC), the cost of manufacturing books will increase by the cost of those tests, which run in the hundreds of dollars, and print schedules will be extended by the time it takes to perform the tests.

Malloy has been tracking this issue for several weeks. Unfortunately, the CPSC is still not able to answer many key questions. I'm hesitant to make definitive statements on the CPSIA, because we're getting a lot of conflicting information. However, here is some of what we know at this point:

The Book Manufacturers' Institute (BMI), AAP, and Printing Industries of America (PIA) are working in concert to present the concerns of the book industry to the CPSC. I've attached a letter sent by AAP to CPSC on Dec. 4, asking for books to be exempt from the new law (as they were under the old regulations) and seeking clarification on how the law will be applied if books are not exempted. The response from the CPSC on Dec. 23 is attached as well. The response from the CPSC on what constitutes an "ordinary book" and a statement that the law does not apply to "ordinary books" are reassuring.

Information being collected by BMI, AAP, and PIA can be found at the following web site hosted by RR Donnelley: http://www.rrd.com/cpsia. This is a good resource to learn more about the CPSIA and the ongoing effort to understand how the regulations will impact the book industry. Please note that the test results posted on this web site show that the levels of lead and phthalates in books are well within the bounds of the law.

Regarding the importance of the Feb 10 deadline, here is the link to an article in Booksellers This Week: http://news.bookweb.org/6515.html An encouraging point in the article is made by Julie Vallese, director of information and public affairs for the CPSC: "The Certificate of Conformity (COC) is necessary for those [children's] products [for children up to age 12] manufactured after February 10."

Vallese stressed that COCs will have to accompany children's books that are manufactured on or after February 10, but not books that were manufactured before that date -- even if the bookseller is ordering them after February 10. But, booksellers must have a "level of confidence" that the children's products they are selling comply with the law.

At the very end of the article, there is a quote from Allan Adler of AAP that pretty well sums up the current situation: "At the very least, publishers need clarification on various aspects of the law from the CPSC. 'We're trying to make it clear to the people on the Hill that, if books are an issue, they have to be explicit on how the law applies to books. How do you test books? What parts? At what point in the assembly process? We need a straightforward statement to the book publishing industry about what testing is required of books.'"

Consistent with the comment from Mr. Adler, we (Malloy) have found two labs capable of doing the testing for us right now, but they are scrambling to have the correct certification. They are CPSC accredited, but in addition to that accreditation, they need certification for the specific tests involved. Since the CPSC hasn't definitively set the tests, that is hard to achieve. One of the tests the government recommended is actually obsolete and no longer accepted by the analytical community.

Malloy's suppliers of ink, paper, film lamination, and adhesives have certified that the materials they supply to us are well within the requirements laid out by the CPSIA. It is important to note that this assurance, though encouraging, does not allow us to provide a COC that complies with the law. As stated in the CPSC's 12/23 response to the AAP letter, testing of components does not meet the requirements of the law. It is the end product that must be tested, and we can not conduct certified end product tests until CPSC specifies the testing procedure. However, the assurances we have received from our suppliers, like the test results posted on the RR Donnelley website, can give publishers and retailers the required "level of confidence" to be able to sell books currently in inventory and those produced prior to February 10th.

Our hope is that the industry will prevail on the CPSC to exempt printed books from the requirements of this legislation, as was the case for books under the prior CPSC regulations. Like all parents, we are passionately concerned for the safety of our children; however, there is no record of a child in the U.S. ever having been poisoned by a paper-based book. The test results posted on the RR Donnelley website demonstrate that this safety record isn't simply the result of good luck - books are a safe product for children. The current effect of the law is to keep children from obtaining books. When applying this law to paper-based books provides zero additional safety to our children, how can such an effect be in the public interest?

In the event that the industry is not able to have books reinstated as an exempt product under the CPSIA, our hope is that Congress and the CPSC will allow us to use data from the components that go into books to certify their safety. Such a process would be similar to that which is used to ensure chemical safety in the workplace. Documents similar to Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) could accompany shipments of the components we use and enable us to certify the safety of the end product. (This would be more than sufficient. Book manufacturing is not alchemy. There is nothing in the process of combining the components of a book that creates lead or phthalates.) Developing an MSDS-like process will require additional time, so we also hope that Congress and the CPSC will postpone the current February 10th deadline to make it possible to develop a workable process.

We'll keep the group tied into this email informed of developments on this matter. We'll also begin very shortly to post relevant decisions on our web site.

Regards,

Joe Upton

Joe Upton
Vice President Sales and Marketing
Malloy Incorporated
734 995-8524

Update from 1/14/09:

On January 9, 2009 Pat Schroeder and Allan Adler from AAP were able to meet again with G.C. Falvey of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Falvey agreed to issue a follow-up letter clarifying her original opinion letter. She will clarify that, with respect to the February 10 deadline for total lead content certification, we are not dealing with accredited third-party testing under Section 102(a)(2) - which has not yet gone into affect due to lack of accreditation standards - but only with general conformity certification (GCC) under Section 102(a)(1). Section 102(a)(1) allows GCC to be based on either the kind of tests that we submitted with the industry's original request for exemption from the CPSC (and are posted on http://www.rrd.com/cpsia) or on results obtained through a "reasonable testing program" that she will further explain is whatever testing program the manufacturer believes is reasonable based on their knowledge of the product and its components. She will indicate that book manufacturers can confidently issue GCCs based on the kind of test results posted on the website and can even use soluble lead testing results as supportive evidence.

Although efforts continue to gain a full exemption for "ordinary books", this will certainly not happen prior to the February 10 deadline. Each book manufacturer must issue a GCC for each book title they produce beginning 2/10/09. In most cases, the GCC would certify that the book title adheres to the "CPSIA 2008 - Lead in Substrate of Children's Products" regulation. If the book has "some inherent play value and constitutes a toy or has toy like features," the book may also have to be certified for the "CPSIA 2008 - Phthalates in Children's Products" requirement as well.

The GCC certificate must "accompany" each shipment of a book title. To meet the "accompanying" requirement, the certificate can be in a hardcopy paper format or available on the WWW in an electronic format. Malloy will link the GCC to the job through our Online Status Report.

The CPSIA provides that a book title can be certified through a "reasonable testing program." Each printer must come up with their own "reasonable testing program." We have established such a program at Malloy and will be prepared to issue a GCC (a form that was developed by a group of BMI members and likely to be used by most book printers) with each job we run on or before 2/10/09.

So, it appears that the industry now has a relatively inexpensive way to comply with the regulation that goes into effect on February 10. It remains to be seen whether our good fortune holds for the next deadline in August.

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

New Title Helps the Administrator Stay Compliant with Copyright Law

This from AEP ONLINE/The Newsletter of Educational Publishing 5-6-08 -

Linworth Publishing, Inc., publisher of professional development resources for K-12 educators, announces the publication of Copyright for Administrators, by Carol Simpson, EdD. Written by a well-known expert in the field of copyright law and schools, this new resource explains what the school administrator needs to know to stay legal and in compliance with copyright law. This ready-reference guide for school administrators is short, to-the-point, and factual. Presented from a management point-of-view, the book guides the administrator through real-life daily copyright challenges, and it explains when the administrator can make decisions locally and when to call in more authoritative legal assistance."

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Chris Stephen interview on NCTI

Chris Stephen, Founder, ReadHowYouWant

Interview on NCTI web site.

This is a fascinating interview with the founder of ReadHowYouWant, the company for which I am now developing a library and institutional services program. Chris had a strong background in publishing and marking up electronic text when his sister developed MS and began having trouble reading. To help her, he applied his publishing and markup skills to create special fonts that her eyes could track on, as well as a software system for converting normal text to these fonts.

From the NCTI web site home page:

The National Center for Technology Innovation (NCTI) advances learning opportunities for all students, with a special focus on individuals with disabilities. Funded by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) at the U.S. Department of Education, NCTI offers technical guidance to facilitate growth and sustainability of assistive and learning tools by fostering innovative technology solutions.

Please note that the font examples giving in the interview are some of the more specialized ones that RHYW uses. Most of their books are printed in fonts that look quite conventional, except for being larger and darker, so they are perfect for public library large print sections.

The big thing that ReadHowYouWant does for most libraries is to produce these large font editions of books that previously were available only in smaller type.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Using Rourke Ebooks in the School Library to Improve Elementary Student Reading Fluency

This is a proposal for a session on using ebooks in school libraries to help elementary students who are struggling with reading. It ties in with my earlier work for AutoSkill, ELLIS (now a part of Pearson) and other ed tech companies. Rourke has always been an ink on paper company, so it is interesting to see them get the ed tech vision and bring out a whole series of ebooks (over 50) that combine ebook technology with solid print publishing understanding of kids' nonfiction interests. Click here for a free online demo of one of their ebooks.

Session Proposal for OASL/WLMA 2008 Combined Conference

By Peyton Stafford


Presentation Title: Using Rourke Ebooks in the School Library to Improve Elementary Student Reading Fluency

In-Depth Description of Presentation:

Repeated guided oral reading with an adult to model correct pronunciation is a research-proven method to improve fluency. Rourke has combined their Discovery Library primary nonfiction with computer technology to produce a series of ebooks that the computer can read aloud to a child, or the child can read with pronunciation and prosody assistance from the computer. Many of these ebooks are also bilingual in English and Spanish for use by ELLs and in dual language programs. Rourke Publishing is a respected name in elementary school library publishing with a long history of publishing for students who struggle. Many of their titles are geared to students who are reading below grade level. Rourke’s newest initiative is to use the talking ebook format to improve reading fluency in young children before they are left behind.

This presentation will give participants

1. Brief overview of guided oral reading in fluency development.

2. Demonstration of Rourke ebooks emphasizing ease of use by students and teachers.

3. Features such as highlighting, bilingual versions and variation of words read per minute according to reading level. Correlation to F&P and Lexiles.

4. Pricing options and licensing arrangements.

The session will conclude with a question/answer period and the opportunity for participants to use and explore Rourke’s ebooks.

Description of Presentation for the Printed Program:

Rourke ebooks in the school library. Fun and easy fluency building.

  • Help motivate struggling readers with audio narration or highlighted words

  • Text and pictures shown on screen.

  • Build vocabulary for English language learners

  • Ideal for auditory learners

  • Promote fluency

  • Easy "Load and Go" technology

Audience:

Elementary

Supervisors

Strand:

Curriculum & Instruction

Information Literacy

Technology

Literature


This is an article I wrote for the Oregon Association of School Libraries Interchange, their quarterly journal. It will appear in print, later this year.


Using the Free Google Docs in School Libraries

by Peyton Stafford

We all know that Google is not a reference publisher, in spite of what some of our colleagues may think, but many of us may underestimate how useful Google's non-search products can be in a school or library setting. Along with their search capability, Google offers several free online tools that could be useful to both school librarians and their students. This article will give a little information on how you and your students might use the easiest of these tools. This is not intended as an in-depth analysis or as a step-by-step instruction book. It is a brief overview. If you want to use some of these wonderful free tools, they come with good online instructions and help, as well as with access to various user groups and to Google customer support. Everything described here is free and very easy.

Why Use Google Docs?

Students and educators frequently collaborate on documents. A group of students may work on a paper together. Another group may be preparing a presentation on a topic. A third group may be gathering scientific data and analyzing it mathematically. A teacher may have written a document or prepared a bibliography for class use. As a librarian, you may have collected a series of links to research web sites, and you need a way to publish these so that a particular class can use them. The student groups all need a way to collaborate as they move through their busy days, working at various networked computers in multiple locations, and then to produce a finished product. The teacher needs a way to publish her document on the internet without going through a lot of trouble to get it done. You need to publish your links list on the Web and don't want to mess up your library web site to do it. Google Docs offers solutions for all of these needs.

What is Google Docs?

Google Docs is an online office suite, consisting of a word processor, a spreadsheet, and a presentation tool. These correspond to Microsoft's Word, Excel and PowerPoint. None of them has all the features you would find in MS Office or in Open Office Suite, but they have enough to perform the functions that students and educators need when producing short papers, spreadsheets and presentations. Each of the Google applications works very much like its MS Office counterpart. I am not going to describe each application's functionality in any detail since, if you know how to use an office suite, you already know what Google Docs applications will do. Instead, let me give some examples of how I have used Google Docs. The main thing to keep in mind is that these are true office suite applications and they are Web 2.0 applications, so they combine the best of traditional office suite functionality with the ability to easily collaborate via the Web.

What Can Google Docs Do for You?

Google Document Application.

Here is an example of how you or your students could use the Document application. I am writing this paper as a Google document. I will save it in Word format and email it to Linda Ague when I have finished. I will also send her a link to the web-based document so that she can share it. Since she is the editor, I will give her the right to edit it as she wishes. I am hoping she will do her editing online so I can review her changes and approve them prior to publication. Kelly Bryant is involved in this, too, so I will also send her a link. Then, when she receives the Word version as an email attachment from Linda, she can edit the online one, too, if she prefers. If we all end up editing and collaborating online, we will save ourselves a lot of effort and put Google Docs to good use. Google Docs will automatically save our work as we edit it, and it will preserve the various revisions automatically, noting which of us is responsible for each change. If we had agreed to collaborate in this way at the beginning, then we could have dispensed with emailing Word attachments, entirely. Up to fifty people can edit any one document at the same time, and as long as no two are editing the same part of the document at once there should not be any conflicts. We can also publish the document to a blog or a web site more or less instantly. Note that, if we do our editing in Google Docs, we do not have to worry about whether some of us are working on PCs and some are working on Macs, or whether we have compatible word processors. We can also work from any reasonably new networked computer with a current browser. If we were students who did not have laptops, we would not have to copy our document onto a floppy or USB key to carry it around with us. We would be able to log onto our Google account from school, public library or home and work from wherever we were. Google Spreadsheet Application.

This corresponds to MS Excel and has all the collaborative features of the Google Document application. I have experimented with it a little, and it seems to work enough like Excel that I have not had any problems. I am not a numbers person, so I am not going to get into the spreadsheet too much. So far, I have used it only once, and that was to help coordinate exhibit booths for the OLA/WLA conference, rather than to crunch numbers. It worked, even for some of my computer-challenged book rep colleagues. Enough said. Google Presentation Application.

This corresponds to MS PowerPoint but with one major advantage: you can publish a presentation via the Internet instantly, and you can present it to people over the Internet without additional software. You don't need a third-party provider to host your presentation. It includes a chat feature, too. So, if you or a student needs to show a presentation to multiple people in multiple locations, you can do it with the click of an icon. This probably might be more useful for educators who need to do professional development sessions remotely than it would be to students. Google Notebook.

This is not technically part of Google Docs, but I am including it because it is instant and it is very helpful for anyone who researches on the Web and then writes about what they find. It is really designed to be used with a browser plug-in that must be downloaded and installed on each computer, so it is not as portable as Google Docs, which do not require any downloading or installation at all. However, it can be used without the plug-in, and it works fine. Many of your students will already have an iGoogle page with links to their Gmail accounts, and they can add Notebook to the page and locate it from there. It lets you write notes as you do your research. These can be shared with your collaborators or kept private. You can also export notes to Google Docs in order to build on them, there, and to use the more powerful word processing and formatting functions.

Disadvantages of Google Docs.

There are two kinds of disadvantages to using Google Docs compared with a hard-drive based office suite. One is that there are some file size limitations. Documents cannot go over 500 KB, presentations over 10 MB, and spreadsheets over 1 MB. Most of the time this will be enough for student use. The other disadvantage is that Google Docs lacks some of the features, such as indexing, that make MS Word so powerful. So, if you're going to write a book in Google Docs, you will have to write it in chapters and then export them to another word processor that indexes and builds a table of contents. You might do this, but your high school students won't need to. The Google help files also document some problems related to web delivery. Sometimes a document won't open or cannot be deleted, or it opens but the text does not appear. I haven't had any of these things happen, but some people have. Google Docs is still in beta, and it is free, so it's not perfect. Google is making it better all the time.

Why Use Google Docs Rather Than Something Else?

I think it is clear that Google Docs is superior to emailing documents back and forth for collaboration and editing. The major drawback is the size limitation, but most of the time that doesn't come into play. Exporting a Google Doc into MS Word, RTF or Open Office format is easy, so if a document gets too big you can always move it off the web and continue working on it on your hard drive. In comparison with other web-based options for collaboration, I think the biggest advantage of Google Docs is that it is truly an office suite. It is also fast and easy to use. Wikis take time to set up, and users have to master the wiki formatting if they are going to do more than write basic text with a few font options. Google Docs and wikis both track version changes, it's just that Google Docs gives you a real word processor to work with. Google Docs also allows the option of letting people view a document without having the power to edit it, which gets around a common problem with wikis. Lastly, if you have ever tried to set up a data table on a wiki and then keep it updated, you know how frustrating this can be compared to putting the information into cells in a spreadsheet. Google Docs lets you use a proper spreadsheet on the web, which is much easier than creating and updating a wiki table. Wikis are wonderful for building a whole community of documents and for linking hundreds of pieces together, but if you just want to write a paper you need a word processor. Blogs are another option for collaboration, but a blog is really set up to post a series of writings rather than to edit a single piece. I love blogs and enjoy reading and writing them, but I don't use them to edit or collaborate as I would a word processor. I use them to communicate finished short pieces. Google Docs and Notebook will quickly export to a blog, and you can link into them via a blog or web page, so if you want to blog your Google docs, it is easy. But again, the advantage of Google Docs is that it gives you a real word processor, spreadsheet and presentation app to work with.

How to Get Started.

Before exploring any of these tools, you will need to set up a Gmail account. This is simple. Just go to http://www.google.com, click on the Gmail link and follow the instructions, or go directly here: http://mail.google.com. The log-on name and password you choose will get you into the tools described above, so pick something that isn't too silly. From the Gmail screen, click on the link at the top to Documents. Here is a direct link to save you time: http://docs.google.com. You will need to log in again using your user name and password, but then you will be ready to go. If you want to add Google Notebook, you will need to locate it among the other Google applications that they list under More, or just go here: http://www.google.com/notebook. We all have different ways of organizing our favorite sites, so I'll leave it up to you to decide how you like it best.

Conclusion.

Google Docs and Google Notebook provide a strong combination of applications for online collaboration. Since they are free and highly portable, they are excellent for use by students and mobile professionals (that's you with the bags of books in your car!). They are superior to hard-drive based office suites for collaboration, though they do not have all the features that power users need. They are also superior to wikis and blogs for document creation and editing because they provide a true word processor and spreadsheet. Since wikis and blogs do not provide a presentation tool, there is no comparison in that area. I highly recommend Google Docs and Notebook. I use them myself. Give them a try and see if they don't make your online and teaching life a little easier.